Article Source

Here we are again, another mass shooting where all the facts involved refute arguments for gun control, and all libs can think about is virtue signaling about how angry they are at “politicians” who “don’t do anything to prevent mass shootings.”

You know what prevents mass shootings?

Holding criminals accountable for their actions. You know what Dems don’t like? Holding criminals accountable for their actions.

They want to ban guns, plain and simple. They don’t care about saving lives.

And sure enough, just like the vast majority of high-profile mass shootings, how the Aurora shooter obtained his weapon completely contradicts with the liberal narrative on private gun ownership.

From InfoWars:

The gunman who shot five people dead and wounded several others in Aurora, Illinois, was not supposed to own a firearm due to previous criminal convictions, according to authorities.

The shooter, 45-year-old Gary Martin, “was not supposed to be in possession of a firearm,” Aurora Police Chief Kristen Ziman said during a press conference Friday.

Martin was prohibited from owning a gun because of a 1995 aggravated assault conviction in Mississippi, she said, but he was able to obtain one through a background check that didn’t require fingerprinting.

He applied for a concealed carry permit a month later, but was rejected following a fingerprint check, leading Illinois State Police to send a letter demanding he voluntarily surrender his weapon, which he never did.

Additionally, this shooting – like most mass shootings – occurred in a gun-free zone.

“This attempted mass public shooting occurred in yet another gun-free zone. 98% of mass public shootings since 1950 have taken place in areas where people can’t defend themselves,” reported the Crime Prevention Research Center.

None of these facts matter to Democrats, now, do they?