CARDINAL GEORGE PELL GUILTY OF SEXUALLY ABUSING CHOIRBOYS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpoBCJ9pfts

Hi,

This is further to our discussion about the socialist, Marxist attack against the Catholic Church and Christianity in general.

As you know, I am absolutely no supporter of the Roman Catholic Church. Yet I do not believe this cardinal has been given a “fair go” or has been proven to have even committed these alleged crimes. About 20% our 6 o’clock News tonight covered this case and verdict today, way out of proportion to the case.

1) While Cardinal Pell was found guilty today by a jury, Cardinal Pell still maintains his innocence.

2) Of the two boys he supposedly sexually assaulted 22 years ago in 1996!!!!, one has since died, and the other who is now his accuser gave all his evidence in CLOSED COURT, and only edited transcripts of some of this evidence was given to the jury only. The whole process, whether he is guilty or not, is a complete and utter mockery, and the judge knows it.

3) Apparently this is the 3rd attempt to convict him. The first Jury trial was dismissed because the Jury couldn’t agree.

4) There are no other witnesses to the testimony of his accuser whatsoever. His accuser could make up any outrageous story he likes, yet it is all hearsay and is completely unproven without as far as I can see a single shred of evidence.

5) So who was on the jury? Presumably all anti-Christian jurors.

6) The corrupt Judiciary in the British Jury system for hundreds of years manipulate the jury selection process in cases like this when the Crown Prosecutor is given a list of suitable and unsuitable jurors from the police or state intelligence agency so that only those jurors who are pagan anti-Christian candidates are accepted for the jury panel and all others are challenged. This is why the Crown has UNLIMITED CHALLENGES but the defence from memory has only SIX. In this way the Crown can convict anybody by ‘stacking the jury’ against the accused. This devious judicial system goes back hundreds of years and the tyranny it supports is widely mentioned in your US Declaration of Independence!

The thing is. While the accused “may” have or may not have committed these alleged acts, it has not been proven. Really, this is neo-Nazi stuff whereby a defendant cannot publicly cross examine his accuser in open court. While his accuser may have once been a choir boy, he is now a mature adult and there is no reason at all why his testimony should be held in a closed court away from public scrutiny where his statements can be challenged by the defendant. Really the whole trial is a mockery

Just my opinion.

Regards.